The digital design landscape has undergone a seismic shift in the last decade. We’ve moved from static mockups and laborious coding to dynamic prototypes, collaborative platforms, and code-free development. A designer’s toolkit today is a sprawling ecosystem of sophisticated software, each promising to streamline workflows and unlock unprecedented efficiency.
Think about it, we (as designers) wield Figma for pixel perfect web and app design, real-time collaboration, rapid prototyping, design libraries, user stories, notes, dev direction, the list goes on… for a while. Webflow empowers us to build functional websites visually, while Anima bridges the gap between design and code. Dropbox or Drive acts as our central repository. Zoom, WhatsApp, and Slack keep communication flowing, while Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign remain powerhouses for visual asset creation. Keynote, PowerPoint, Google Slides, and Word help articulate and present our ideas, while Acrobat ensures document portability. Excel and Google Sheets manage data, and email clients keep us connected. WordPress and various hosting providers form the backbone of countless websites, and stock libraries and icon systems provide readily available assets. Again, the list goes on.
And here’s to the champion Googler and YouTuber – searching, learning, and executing on countless hours of self taught software “How To’s”.
To the “Design Thinker” mindset, thoroughly honed through rigorous practice.
To the years of schooling that laid the foundational knowledge
So, when a client throws the question, dripping with skepticism, “Wait, so… just because you’re using Figma, Sketch, Webflow, Anima, Dropbox, Zoom, What’s App, Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Keynote, Slack, PowerPoint, Word, Acrobat, Google Docs, Slides, Excel, Email clients, WordPress, Hosting providers, Stock libraries, Icon systems, a champion Googler and YouTuber, a ‘Design Thinker’, years of schooling – you can charge me more?”
Unapologeticlly, “Fuck yes.”
But the follow-up question often stings with a frustrating logic: “Ok, take it easy. But you’re using Webflow, right? So how are you charging the same for production? Aren’t you able to do this in a fraction of the time?”
This is the crux of the efficiency paradox in the design industry. Our tools allow us to do more, faster. We can iterate rapidly, build complex interactions with ease, and even launch entire websites without writing a single line of code. But does this increased efficiency automatically translate to higher compensation? Often, the answer is a disheartening no.
The client’s perspective is understandable – less time, less money. They see the output, the final deliverable. If a website that used to take weeks to code can now be built visually in a fraction of the time, why should they pay the same? They perceive the tools as doing the heavy lifting, diminishing the perceived value of the designer’s expertise.
This line of thinking, however, completely misses the crucial distinction between tool and craftsman. A high-end chef with state-of-the-art kitchen appliances doesn’t charge less for a meticulously prepared meal simply because their tools are efficient. The value lies in their skill, their knowledge of ingredients and techniques, their creative vision, and their ability to orchestrate the entire process.
Similarly, a designer’s value isn’t solely tied to the time spent pushing pixels or writing code. It encompasses a vast range of skills and knowledge:
Strategic Thinking: Understanding the client’s business goals, target audience, and market landscape to create effective design solutions.
User Experience (UX) Expertise: Conducting research, creating user flows, and designing intuitive interfaces that meet user needs and business objectives.
Visual Design Skills: Crafting aesthetically pleasing and brand-aligned visuals that communicate effectively.
Interaction Design (IxD): Designing seamless and engaging interactions that enhance the user experience.
Information Architecture (IA): Organizing content logically and intuitively to ensure easy navigation.
Accessibility Knowledge: Designing inclusive experiences that cater to users with disabilities and languages.
Technical Proficiency: Mastering a complex array of design and development tools.
Communication and Collaboration: Effectively articulating design decisions, providing constructive feedback, and collaborating seamlessly with clients and developers.
Problem-Solving: Identifying design challenges and developing creative and effective solutions.
Project Management: Organizing tasks, managing timelines, and ensuring projects are delivered on time and within budget.
These skills are not magically infused by the software we use. They are honed through years of learning, practice, and experience. The tools are simply extensions of our abilities, allowing us to execute our expertise more efficiently.
//
Let me tell you a story about a guy with a shovel. Spoiler alert: it was me, during a summer working landscaping and maintenance on a golf course. Shovel after shovel filling the beds of Gators (a work vehicle) until the suspension groaned under the weight of dirt, mulch, rocks, or whatever else the course demanded – a slow, methodical process of scooping, lifting, and dumping.
Then came that fateful day at the quarry, a dusty pit where we sourced all the material. Amidst the usual piles of earth and stone, something caught my eye – a piece of heavy machinery. It was a front-end loader. Now, being young and fueled by boredom and the primal urge for efficiency, a dangerous idea sparked in my teenage brain.
Ignoring the potential reprimand, I hopped into the operator’s seat. The controls were surprisingly intuitive – levers, pedals and a wheel. After a few tentative maneuvers and a few clutch grinds, I figured it out. With a newfound sense of power, I lowered the bucket into a pile of gravel. One smooth, effortless scoop, and the back of the Gator was nearly full. It was a revelation.
Suddenly, what had been a twenty-minute ordeal was reduced to a minute or two of controlled mechanical power. Between the four of us on the crew, hours were shaved off the workday – or at least what was expected of it.
So where was the acknowledgment of this newfound value I had introduced?
The golf course superintendent simply grunted, “Oh nice, good shit. Don’t break it.” That was it. No bonus, no pat on the back. We just moved on to the ever-growing list of tasks. Golf course’s have an appetite for labor. So… what? That was it. Yep. End of story. Sometimes we don’t get what we want, even if we are smart enough to use the right tool for the job, save our company money, impress your client, etc. Just because you are growing as a designer, growing your tool belt, extending your design knowledge to the edges of the galaxy – guess what, your client doesn’t care. Do you know what they care about? Time and money, and justifying both.
//
We invest time and effort in learning new tools and optimizing our workflows, only to find that the expectation is simply to deliver more, faster, for the same price or less. The efficiency gained becomes an invisible tax, benefiting the client or the employer without directly benefiting the designer.
So, can we, and is it okay to, charge the same when we can complete work in a fraction of the time thanks to these powerful tools? The answer yes. Here’s why:
1. Value Beyond Time: Our compensation should be based on the value we deliver, not solely on the hours we bill. The value lies in the strategic thinking, the user-centered approach, the aesthetic sensibility, and the technical expertise that informs our design decisions. Efficient tools allow us to translate this value into tangible results more quickly, but the underlying value remains.
2. Increased Complexity and Scope: Often, the efficiencies gained by modern tools allow us to tackle more complex projects or deliver a wider scope of work within the same timeframe. What previously required multiple designers and weeks of effort can now be achieved by a smaller team or even a single designer in less time. We are essentially delivering more value in the same (or less) amount of time.
3. The Cost of Mastery: Acquiring and mastering these sophisticated tools requires significant investment in time, training, and often subscription fees. This expertise is a valuable asset that justifies our rates.
4. Strategic Advantage: Our ability to leverage these tools efficiently provides a strategic advantage to our clients. Faster turnaround times, more iterative feedback loops, and the ability to launch products and campaigns more quickly all contribute to their bottom line. We are not just saving ourselves time; we are saving our clients time and money in the long run.
5. The “That’s What I Cost” Argument: As Chris Do succinctly states, pricing is often a reflection of experience, expertise, and market demand. Our rates are not arbitrary figures; they are based on the value we bring to the table, regardless of the specific tools we use to deliver that value. Ask yourself – what do you cost?
Moving Towards Value-Based Pricing:
The key to overcoming the efficiency paradox lies in shifting the conversation from time-based billing to value-based pricing. Instead of focusing on the number of hours spent, we need to articulate the value our design solutions bring to the client’s business:
Increased Conversions: A well-designed website or app can significantly improve conversion rates, directly impacting revenue.
Improved User Engagement: Intuitive and engaging interfaces lead to higher user satisfaction and retention.
Stronger Brand Identity: Consistent and impactful visual design builds brand recognition and trust.
Reduced Development Costs: Well-documented and user-tested designs minimize costly revisions during the development phase.
Faster Time to Market: Efficient workflows enable quicker product launches and campaign deployments.
By focusing on these tangible outcomes, we can justify our rates based on the value we deliver, rather than the time it takes us to produce it.
The Ongoing Evolution:
The design landscape will continue to evolve, with new tools and technologies constantly emerging. As designers, we must remain adaptable and embrace these advancements to enhance our efficiency and capabilities. However, we must also advocate for the recognition of our underlying expertise and the value we bring beyond the mere utilization of these tools.
The next time a client questions your rates based on the efficiency of your workflow, remember my shovel story. The tool changed the process, but the intelligence and initiative to use it effectively were what truly generated the value. Be impactful, be valuable – compensated will follow.